REVIEW PETITION
In India, a binding decision of the Supreme Court/High Court can be reviewed in Review
Petition. The parties aggrieved on any order of the Supreme Court on any apparent error can file
a review petition. Taking into consideration the principle of stare decisis, courts generally do not unsettle a decision, without a strong
case. This provision regarding review is an exemption to the legal principle of
stare decisis.
Article 137 of the Constitution provides that subject to
provisions of any law and rule made under Article 145 the Supreme Court of India has the power to review any
judgement pronounced (or order made) by it. Under Supreme Court Rules, 1966
such a petition needs to be filed within 30 days from the date of judgement or
order. It is also recommended that the petition should be circulated without
oral arguments to the same bench of judges that delivered the judgement (or
order) sought to be reviewed.
Furthermore, even after dismissal of
a review petition, the SC may consider a curative petition in order to prevent abuse of its process and to cure
gross miscarriage of justice
CURATIVE PETITION
The concept of Curative
petition was evolved by the Supreme Court of India in the matter of Rupa
Ashok Hurra vs. Ashok Hurra and Anr. (2002) where the question
was whether an aggrieved person is entitled to any relief against the final
judgement/order of the Supreme Court, after dismissal of a review petition The Supreme Court in the said
case held that in order to prevent abuse of its process and to cure gross
miscarriage of justice, it may reconsider its judgements in exercise of its
inherent powers.[2] For this purpose the Court has devised what has been termed as a "curative"
petition. In the Curative petition, the petitioner is required to aver
specifically that the grounds mentioned therein had been taken in the review
petition filed earlier and that it was dismissed by circulation. This has to be
certified by a senior advocate. The Curative petition is then
circulated to the three senior most judges and the judges who delivered the
impugned judgement, if available.
No time limit is given for filing Curative petition
REQUIREMENTS
To entertain the curative petitions, the court has laid down
certain specific conditions. Its laid down in order The requirements which are
needed in order to accept the curative petitions are:
1.
The petitioner will have to establish that there was a genuine
violation of principles of natural justice and fear of the bias of the
judge and judgement that adversely affected him.
2.
The petition shall state specifically that the grounds mentioned
had been taken in the review petition and that it was dismissed by
circulation.
3.
The curative petition must accompany certification by a senior
lawyer relating to the fulfillment of the above requirements.
4.
The petition is to be sent to the three senior most judges and
judges of the bench who passed the judgement affecting the petition, if
available.
5.
If the majority of the judges on the above bench agree that the
matter needs hearing, then it would be sent to the same bench (as far as
possible).
6.
The court could impose “exemplary costs” to the petitioner if
his plea lacks merit.
While Review Petition has constitutional recognition,Curative is
product of Supreme Court Judgment.
No comments:
Post a Comment